Hello to everyone out there in blog land
Now that the push by homosexual lobby groups in Australia for same sex marriage is gaining momentum, I feel the need to express my views on this issue. Although I may be a lone voice of opposition crying out in the wilderness, I still wish to exercise my right to express an opinion on this contentious issue.
As I see it, same sex marriage is not a moral, religious or political issue. Nor are there any discriminatory, human rights or equality issues involved. Put simply, same sex marriage was a non issue that has been turned into a political football by homosexual lobby groups, using a basket of red herrings, to put pressure on the current minority government in the Federal Parliament of Australia to get what they want.
Red herring number one is gay pride.
Being gay has absolutely nothing to do with being homosexual. Depending on the dictionary used, being gay means to be lighthearted and carefree. This is a mood or feeling not a sexual activity. Therefore, anyone can be gay in the true meaning of the word. If homosexuals are so proud of what the are, why did they hijack a perfectly innocent word and corrupt its meaning to describe themselves. After all, heterosexuals are simply heterosexuals and I don’t see being so is a matter for pride because it is simply the way nature intended us to be. Conclusion: there is no such as gay pride.
Red herring number two is homophobia.
Homophobia is a word invented by homosexuals to describe anyone who disagrees with their push for same sex marriage. Homophobia is made up of two words; homo: meaning a genius of hominids including modern man and phobia: meaning abnormal intense and irrational fear of a given situation, organism or object. Put simply, to be homophobic is to suffer from an abnormal, intense and irrational fear of one’s own species irrespective of gender. Conclusion: if there is such a condition as homophobia there must also be the condition of hetero-phobia: an abnormal intense and irrational fear of the opposite sex.
Red herring number three is gay rights.
Under Article 2 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, homosexuals have the same human rights as everyone else. But, is being homosexual or heterosexual a human right or simply a human condition? In other words, does Article 2 make homosexuality or heterosexuality a human right? As stated above, being gay is as mood or feeling not a sexual activity and if being gay in this context was a human right, what a wonderful world it would be. Conclusion: there is no such thing as homosexual (gay) rights.
Red herring number four is discrimination.
Up until the 1970’s homosexual sex acts were a crime. This made homosexuals vulnerable to arrest, criminal charges, court appearances and punishment. During the cold war era, this vulnerability was exploited by both sides and homosexuals were deliberately targeted, compromised and blackmailed into spying against their own country. This may have been the rationale behind the discriminatory policy of not allowing homosexuals to be employed in government agencies or serve in the military. However, at the height the cold war period, homosexual sex acts were decriminalised . This paved the way for discriminatory policies to be removed. Today homosexuals serve openly in parliament, in the judiciary, in government agencies and the military without fear of discrimination. Conclusion: homosexuals are no longer discriminated against.
Red herring number five is marriage equality.
This is the biggest red herring in the basket and will be difficult to refute without offending and upsetting our homosexual brethren. Homosexual lobby groups claim that religious institutions and governments should not define, morally or legally, what a family unit should be made up of and they are absolutely right. Yet this is exactly what homosexuals want government to do by changing marriage legislation. In my view, marriage equality means: no mater what social status a marriage partner has outside the marriage, neither partner should try to dominate the other. In other words, equality of the sexes in marriage.
To further refute the validity of homosexual claims for marriage equality, one has to go back in time to the early stages of human development. Whether one is a creationist or an evolutionist is irrelevant. This is because it was mother nature who determined that, for mammals (including homo sapiens); copulation for procreation was to be between adult males and females. Because human offspring take up to twenty years to reach maturity, Mother Nature also gave our species the ability to form long term (monogamous pair bond) relationships to ensure our offspring survived to maturity. But the story did not end there; Mother Nature also gave our species a special gift that enables us to engage in sexual activity solely for pleasure as a means of cementing and maintaining these long term bonds. This pair bonding is explained in the book ‘The Naked Ape’ by Zoologist Desmond Morris (Della Publishing, New York 1967). Over many thousands of years, as human settlements and communities grew and became more complex, these long term bonds became formalised, stylised, ritualised, politicised and institutionalised into what are now modern marriage bonds.
Unfortunately, Mother Nature is not perfect and genetic defects (physical and mental) appear from time to time in most species on this planet. This is a hard fact of life on Mother Earth. With our species it is generally accepted that the brain is our biggest sex organ. When two people of the opposite sex are in an intimate situation, their sensory organs send signals to the sexual receptors in the brain that trigger physical sexual arousal. So why are two people of the same sex sexually attracted to each other and become aroused? Is it caused by a genetic disorder or a chemical/hormonal imbalance in the brain? In other words, are the sexual receptors in the brains of homosexuals malfunctioning? If this is the case then homosexuals are suffering a form of sexual dysfunction and should be treated as such.
Is same sex marriage the answer? The objective answer is no. Giving legal sanction for one man to marry another will enshrine, in marriage, the unnatural bonding of two males for sexual gratification. Following decriminalisation of homosexual sex acts, the anal penetration of men and the anal penetration and double penetration of women has proliferated in the pornography industry. I believe that this is demeaning to all those who produce and consume this type of pornography because it can hardly be classified as erotic. There also appears to be some serious health risks associated with this form of sexual activity. Was it coincidental that the first major outbreak of the HIV/AIDS virus was within the homosexual community in San Francisco; or was it a warning from Mother Nature that this unnatural form of sex is dangerous to our health? This insidious virus has changed the way medical services are delivered and brought about the need to protect ourselves by using safe sex practices. Is this the sexual legacy we want to pass on to future generations?
Given the loss of human life due to HIV/AIDS and the financial cost of research to find a cure, perhaps it is time for a radical re-think about this issue. In the age of genetics, DNA, stem cell research etc, surely in-depth research can be initiated to locate and isolate the area of the brain where sexual arousal is triggered so that this type of sexual dysfunction can be treated. Surely this will be a better solution than allowing politicians to pander to the egos and whims of homosexuals to secure their minority (gay) vote.
Why should politicians be allowed a conscience vote on the issue? Given the conflict of interest should homosexual politicians be allowed to vote on this issue? I believe the government should seek a mandate from the people in a referendum in keeping with the democratic principles of Australia.
It is my hope that this post will generate some objective debate on this issue rather than subjective name calling and I invite comments from both sides of the sexual divide.
Personally, I believe that the human female is the most delightful loving and caring creature on the planet and sharing a long term relationship with a woman is one of the great joys of living. I could not imagine living my life without such a relationship and I feel sad for those men who are unable to do so through no fault of their own making.
aquarianmist 
(You deleted this comment. Here it is again)
Hello, I welcome the chance to discuss this topic in a positive manner. Thank you for this opportunity. I agree with you that same-sex marriage is a non-issue, but for different reasons. Not sure how “red herrings” are relevant in this context, but I will address the topics you brought up one by one.
“Red herring” 1 : If all words that describe your group are used as pejoratives by the people outside your group, then it makes perfect sense to adopt a more positive sounding one. Also, if you take issue with people or groups “hijacking” certain terms, then you have to be honest and express your displeasure with all the other groups and organizations who do the same thing. As for the “pride” part, it is simply a reaction against being unjustly labeled as “shameful”. To paraphrase your own very sensible comment , could you accept that “homosexuals are simply homosexuals and I don’t see being so is a matter for pride because it is simply the way nature intended us to be” ? If you could, and everyone else would follow suit, “gay pride” wouldn’t even be necessary.
“Red herring” 2 : Leaving aside your unfounded assertion that the word “homophobia” was “invented” by homosexuals, your definition doesn’t really have anything to do with what the word actually refers to. I assume you were attempting satire ? (I’m not trying to be condescending here, I genuinely don’t understand the point of purposely misunderstanding such a simple concept)
“Red herring” 3 : Uhm….okay, now you are actually arguing that there is no such thing as “rights” full stop. (???)
“Red herring” 4 : Removing discriminatory policies does not mean discrimination itself simply ceases to be. Is there no longer any racial discrimination in America because a black man became president ? No. Is there no more discrimination against gay people in countries with openly gay elected officials ? Again, no.
“Red herring” 5 : And now you’re actually agreeing with the group you claim to disagree with, which somehow leads you to a conclusion that’s completely unrelated to the topic you claim to be discussing. Again (???) As for the rest of it, if you’re going to antropomorphise nature, then why saddle it with all your preconceptions ? If the subject of homosexuality interests you, then why not study the biological facts a little closer, instead of answering your own questions with unfounded assertions ?
Your opinion is noted, but none of it comes near to formulating a valid argument against gay marriage, or dismantling any of the arguments in favor. In closing , I would like to say that I admire the sentiments you describe in the first sentence of your last paragraph, and I wish all straight men shared them. As for your last sentence, let me assure you, there is no reason to feel sad. Same-sex relationships do indeed include that exact kind of happiness.
If you have not yet seen this one, I sense you are going to love this
*LGBT Lies On Tradition Of Marriage Blown Away Time To Restore Marriage To Respectable*
Heterosexual couples were brought together to be married for many different reasons over the centuries / millenniums: Such as bettering diplomatic and commercial relations. Such as to keep property in the family. Such as a man impregnated a woman. Such as it was forced because of ensuring an heir. Such as it was because a male had to marry more than one female so they all could work together to sustain a family. Such as it was because of arranging marriages for the strategic assembly of land. Such as establishing alliances among kings. Such as marrying off their own wives to establish alliances with other ruling men. Such as a political arrangement between two families who wished to seal their ties as well merge assets. Such as because someone born with a penis and someone born with a vagina wanted to be together and their parents consented. Such as to arrange the passing on of a plot of land to family of which adjacent family marriages could combine plots from both families. Such as the religious of the 16th century began to promote same religion to next generation. Such as young people born with the opposite sex genital having the freedom to promote their choice union based upon love. Such as mutual sexual attraction of those born with the opposite sex genital.
The one thing that never changed over the centuries / millenniums was the fact that marriage was always in honour of the significance of heterosexual unions being recognized for what they are, as significantly above any other kind of union for one obvious reason which the LGBT never once made mention of. This is because quite obviously it is thanks to heterosexual unions that we all even exist and not homosexual unions. The LGBT completely ignored the fact that hundreds / thousands of years of only heterosexual unions being honoured with marriage proves beyond any shadow of doubt that marriage is always about honouring the significance of the unity of the one sexual orientation to which we all awe our very existence thus honours exclusively heterosexual unions hence the significance of what marriage has always been about with hundreds / thousands of years of proof of this very simple fact that the LGBT always cowered from so much as acknowledging. To them it was obviously all about making a mockery of marriage with their lies and deceptions because they do not want to accept the significant difference of heterosexual unions to that of other sexual unions. This gets better. While thousands of years prove what marriage is all about, they ignored that and they instead attempted to claim the obvious lie that marriage was about the reason why heterosexual couples came together to be married (as mentioned in the previous paragraph) and not the actual significance of marriage always being about honouring heterosexual unions. The lie, the deception.
The reason obviously that marriage has never been about homosexual unions is because homosexual unions factually do not even come close to comparing to the significance of heterosexual unions because the fact remains that if it were up to homosexual unions to sustain the human race, we would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective and there is quite obviously not anything worth honouring in that. They do not want to accept the fact that homosexual unions do not even come close to comparing to the significance of the one sexual unity that we all owe our very existence too and that unity is heterosexual unions.
For years the LGBT tried to make marriage about their lies, and when they failed, they tried to make it about more lies, and they did this again and again and again as I will share many examples of this coming up. Pay attention because if you do, you are about to become a master on not only the foundation of this primary issue, but how to plow through many LGBT lies and deceptions on your own . The following proves that they didn’t care that thousands of years of only heterosexual unions being honoured with marriage proves what marriage is in honour of and created for.
As they attempted forcing the following lies and deceptions over the years I was exposing their lies and deceptions as they were doing it to prepare our elected and appointed officials and people in general on many online political, news, social forums and message boards sites on how to deal with their lies and deceptions. Over the years I found myself being banned because I was being slandered by LGBT and their pathetic lies. So began the increased insanity of their so called liberal policies to prevent the public from exposing their pathetic lies and deceptions in North America years ago. Here is some of the other pathetic rhetoric that they tried which I always bested with ease.
They tried such rhetoric as, if people of different races can get married then so should same sex couples yet ignoring the fact that marriage between different racial variations of human were always about honouring heterosexual unions because thanks to heterosexual unions we even exist and therefor is worth acknowledging with the distinction and honour.
They tried to claim that marriage is about consenting adults, yet they evaded the fact that it is among heterosexual adults (unfortunately for some, paedophilia marriages occur in some messed up countries of which people of such countries have been migrating to Canada in mass numbers recently with the liberals arms wide open even though these people have revealed to ignore host countries laws as their numbers increase. But this too was always the “heterosexual” version of paedophilia)
They tried to claim that marriage is about love, yet again they evaded the fact that not everyone gets married out of love and for those who do are those born with the opposite sex genital that the other is born with aka heterosexual unions.
They attempted to claim that if heterosexuals who can’t have children can get married then so should homosexual sex partners while completed evading the fact that heterosexual couples who can’t have children & getting married doesn’t disrespect that marriage is about honouring the significance of heterosexual unions.
Then they attempted the claim that heterosexuals disrespect marriage through divorce, but divorce is just ending a marriage and quite obviously doesn’t disrespect that marriage is about honouring the significance of heterosexual unions.
They attempted to claim that cheating on one’s spouse disrespects marriage, yet even that doesn’t disrespect that marriage is about honouring heterosexual unions. It just disrespects the spouse which can wind up in divorce.
I am not kidding you when I say they tried every lie and deception to make a mockery of marriage and failed at every turn. It obviously wasn’t ever about LGBT having a legitimate claim, it was about the LGBT defecating on the meaning of marriage with every lie and deception that they could possibly fathom compulsively and obsessively. By then I was on a fraction of the sites I was previously on because of these liars and their slander whining hater bigot homophobe to management of every site every time they realized their lies didn’t stand a chance against the facts I share like they did work against the general public. These liars also threatened elected officials with using the main stream media to slander them with their lies to try and hide their lack of validity while painting the unaware public with such rhetoric as anyone who is against their lies is a homophobe, a bigot, a hater etc. So our officials became cowards and sell outs. It seems as though every year in the past 17 years I have been doing this I have been respecting our officials less and less until now I have next to nothing for respect for our elected and appointed officials on Federal, Provincial and even Municipal levels but where else do you go to get rid of the injustices with facts that expose lies and deceptions on the foundations of primary issues?!
They claimed discrimination which is another lie because everyone has the right to marry someone born with the opposite sex genital that any individual is born with because that is what marriage is about. They claimed so they could get benefits, but they could have gotten benefits for their same sex partner without making a mockery of marriage and without defecating on the significance of honouring the one sexual union to which we all owe our very existence which is heterosexual unions. Also without wasting millions of tax payers dollars on a bunch of factually proven lies.
Canada defecated on marriage and heterosexual unions with cowards using the excuse of political party trade off which is quite obviously betraying democracy. In the USA, because their congress would never pass such pathetic lies and a mockery made of marriage along with defecating on the significance of heterosexual unions through them, it was then somehow handed to what is now world renowned as the USA Supreme Court Of Mockery. I, at this point want in contact with all the legal officials related to this case (about a hundred if I recall) but they ignored fact in the end and sold out thus defecating on marriage and heterosexual unions as well. At this point I was puzzled because I wasn’t yet clued in to the globalist agenda and hadn’t quite realized that lobbyist dictatorship was betraying democracy but I knew something fishy was going on. I even contacted Barack Obama directly but I could only squeeze in a short message of which he responded very quickly telling me they were going to do it anyway. I was so furious that I couldn’t even send his online email form enough of the proper information (because of lack of characters you get to use) but I think I may have shared with him where to find it but suspect he didn’t even bother. I was surprised at how fast Obama got back (within a day or two if I recall) but started to become very disappointed in him especially in lieu of, I refrained from targeting him over the years to give the man a chance to prove himself and I only grew more disappointed in him from there and lost respect.
The only thing we have had over thousands of years honouring the one human unity we can thank for our existence was shamed by people who obviously have no respect for heterosexual unions or that we even exist thanks to such unions. They quite obviously only cared to use every lie, deception and dirty trick to defecate on that unity thus for now rendering marriage as garbage that is not even worthy of honour. Marriage is not about honouring that if it were up to homosexual unions to sustain the human race, we would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective.
I even had LGBTe’rs try to contest the primary fact on the foundation of this issue that thousands of years of only heterosexual unions being honoured with marriage proves that marriage is about honouring the significance of the one sexual unity we all owe our very existence too which is quite obviously heterosexual unions. But they attempted and are still attempting such with such nonsense as … ghost marriages.
Ghost marriages: In China if the first born didn’t get married then the second born could not get married until the first born got married first. If the second born died before the first born got married then it was deemed acceptable to have what they referred to as a ghost marriage which was always in honour of a “heterosexual union.”
Keep in mind that I have tackled this issue many times over the last 17 years I have been taking on many foundations of primary issues and in this instance sharing the facts that exposes the lies and deceptions of the LGBT on foundation of this issue. At one time someone made mention of there was a shaman who, because his people were scared of his shaman abilities, didn’t provoke that he lived with a same sex partner and of course I researched this for myself to analyze what was being shared of this because they were claiming that this was a marriage. I recall finding some articles of which stated that in the authors opinion this was a marriage. Of course I found that laughable because being in a relationship with someone is not a marriage unless you actually go through with the official ceremony. I have been in two relationships but never married but again obviously the LGBT would be calling it a marriage because all they really do have are lies and deceptions. They had LGBT becoming scholars just to call all the homosexual relationships they could find throughout history in their opinion as marriages but that was obviously pathetic. Now keep in mind that the leftists and LGBT have had time to infiltrate the First Nations for years on this now and from what I see going on the lobbyists had our government revoke a promise to try and get the First Nations angry with the citizens of Canada when it is not the citizens of Canada voting for people to sell us out to lobbyist dictatorship which is treason, not democracy. Thus obviously having rubbed off their shady tactics upon the first Nations so who knows what the First Nations have agreed to do behind closed doors to help those who actually are the ones who betrayed them in the first place into screw the citizens of Canada. I went to look for that shaman story again today and that story was gone, instead I see that suddenly there are a bunch of releases that begin with the phrase “two spirited” (an LGBT happened too mention such recently as well) so I did a little research and found what looks like severely LGBT twisted compositions.
According to the articles that recently popped up on the internet in recent years, they were claiming that First Nations referred to as “two spirited men and women” involved in relationships of being with the same sex did not hold a marriage ceremony, they just stayed together in long-term relationships. But we have LGBT activists becoming scholars and referring to any homosexual union that they find recorded throughout history and claiming that, that it is their opinion this is a marriage to no surprise but it is quite obviously not a marriage, just a relationship.
I also found something else recently I had not come across before.
New York in the 1920’s, if two women wanted to attempt to make a mockery of marriage, even though it was not a legitimate marriage to unite two people born of the same sex going through with it, a woman would masculinaize her name and dress up like a man, or get a man to get her marriage certificate for her. She would then dress up like a man to make a deceptive mockery of the marriage ceremony by deceiving people into thinking that she was a man marrying a woman which was obviously extremely disrespectful and a mockery made of marriage by two homosexuals using a deception to fool people into it. The men wouldn’t have ceremonies, they would just stay together in long term relationships while attempting to pass of their relationship as a marriage of which neither was a legitimate marriage quite obviously. Leave it up to the LGBT to try and pass off a deception as legitimate, just take this insanity now escalated to the canadian government trying to make criminals out of citizens for not supporting factually proven LGBT lies with bill C 16.
Also fyi, there is a story of homosexuals attempting to make a mockery of marriage in Rome but they were beheaded for it.
Marriage wouldn’t even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions. None of us would even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions which quite obviously makes heterosexual unions, well above all other unions, worth honouring. You don’t have to get married to have kids as a heterosexual couple but that doesn’t detract from the fact that marriage is about honouring the significance of the one sexual union that we all owe our very existence too and once again that unity are quite obviously heterosexual unions.
Because here I sit once again sharing facts that the LGBT is not able to contest with so much as a shred of validity, they are going to resort to their same pathetic stereotypical lies such as referring to me as a hater for exposing their lies they used to defecate on society. they are going to try labeling me as a homophobe for exposing their lies they use to defecate on society. They are going to try to make me out to be in-sighting others to hate for exposing their lies that they used to defecate on society. They are going to try to make their every lie and deceptions the issue including attempting to make me out to be a bigot for revealing them for the obsessive compulsive liars deceivers and bigots that they prove to be. That is what the left does, make up lies about you to try and deflect their lies from being exposed while trying to put words in your mouth with misquotes etc. They do this to try and hide that they have no validity in contesting the simple fact which exposes their lies and deceptions they used to make this soon to be short lived mockery of marriage. They do this to try and make their lies about me the issue in hopes that the facts that expose their lies and deceptions are hidden by a slew of their lies and deceptions. As for me, I am use to dealing with it with their lying deceiving weak pathetic mentalities. I always stick with fact revealing their lies and deceptions and when they realize that their stereotypical garbage doesn’t work vs facts that expose them wide open, that is when they have always resorted to making up lies about me such as hater, bigot and homophobe to have me banned off of hundreds of sites over the years. They misquote you obsessively and compulsively as well. I am blocked from many sites because of these pathetic and big time exposed liars wasting your tax dollars to force lies on your children and society as a whole which has gotten completely ridiculous. Of course once they forced their lies and deceptions through legislation they turned around and made policies such as you can’t even speak about sexual orientation on online news and political discussion forums. This isn’t the only thing they lie and deceive about, they do it on the foundation of many of their issues to do with their bias agenda that I address
Sadly enough I have come to know their mentalities, deceptions and snaky tricks better than the back of my hand, but good thing I did go through all the rhetoric and the discrimination I faced while liars I was exposing made false claims of discrimination to deceive the public with their lies and deceptions because here I sit exposing them, their lies and their shady tactics with this masterpiece.
What would have prevented this LGBT insanity from escalating in the first place, is if when homosexuality was legalized, discrimination against heterosexuality was criminalized because it has been the heterosexuals facing the discrimination the whole time. Yeah that is right, time for you to realize. Some of them pretend to be the opposite sex to make fools out of heterosexuals then when heterosexuals become infuriated with such sick behavior used to infiltrate and traumatize the heterosexual it’s the homosexual lying and they always resorted to such lies as homosexual johnny just wants to be left with homosexual Timmy and just wants to be left alone which is quite obviously the lie they were already forcing on the public soon after homosexuality became legal in North America.
Now that their every lie and deception is exposed quite thoroughly to do with specifically marriage, it’s time to put an end to the LGBT insanity manifestation permanently and globally beginning right here in North America by restoring marriage to a respectable state, criminalizing anyone pretending to be the opposite sex that they are born ever again and start working towards having people actually accepting themselves for what they are instead of this insanity of encouraging them to not accept themselves for what they are while trying to force legally on the public that anyone should ever have to accept them for what these people are not! Decades of LGBT lies need to be removed from legislation and I have been proving this with the facts that expose those lies for almost 2 decades now. (globalists are using the LGBT to make a mockery of our societies and turn us against one another hence the mass funding the LGBT gets) What do I get for doing such an excellent job over the years, hidden from the public by being banned almost everywhere and the few sites I am on have little activity. I get defecated on by a bunch of people treating my fellow citizens and Earthlings with a bunch of lies and deceptions and dirty tricks while wasting tonnes of tax payer cash on lies as they get away with defecating on society with such insane rhetoric! Even though I have been getting the short end of the stick for doing the very best anyone I have seen ever do on these issues, it is my pleasure to continue fighting the good fight for the well being and sanity of current and future generations. I know I have become aggressive and sometimes even short tempered over the years, but who wouldn’t in lieu of these circumstances?!!
Also I highly recommend you come to my YouTube channel and look for the 2 and a half minute video recently released titled *Canadian Government Bill Stating Citizens Have To Lie Or Be Made Criminal*
love
Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada
Feel free to look for the title by LGBT columnist “Here’s Why The Idea Of Traditional Marriage’ Is Total Bullsh*t” on the Huffington Post Canada site because you can now easily see through their lies and deceptions and have just read allot more than just how that rhetoric was easily debunked for the lies and deceptions it represents. If you paid attention to what you just read, you now have the potential to become master on the foundation of the issue and support it with what you just learned.
“Being gay has absolutely nothing to do with being homosexual. Depending on the dictionary used, being gay means to be lighthearted and carefree. ” this is a fallacy: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/27/Appeal-to-Definition
“As stated above, being gay is as mood or feeling not a sexual activity and if being gay in this context was a human right, what a wonderful world it would be. Conclusion: there is no such thing as homosexual (gay) rights.” there are no things as heterosexual rights then. “Seventy-eight countries maintain laws that make same-sex consensual sex between adults a criminal offence, and seven countries (or parts thereof) impose the death penalty for same-sex consensual sex. They are Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Mauritania, Sudan, the twelve northern states of Nigeria, and the southern parts of Somalia.[5]” so yes gays are discriminated against.
“To further refute the validity of homosexual claims for marriage equality, one has to go back in time to the early stages of human development. Whether one is a creationist or an evolutionist is irrelevant. This is because it was mother nature who determined that, for mammals (including homo sapiens); copulation for procreation was to be between adult males and females. Because human offspring take up to twenty years to reach maturity, Mother Nature also gave our species the ability to form long term (monogamous pair bond) relationships to ensure our offspring survived to maturity. ”
http://www.johncorvino.com/2010/09/24/the-invention-of-marriage/
Here e it’s pointed out that in this light to be only for reproduction and nothing else…no freedom of association or homos to start a family even though they act the same and use similiar reproduction methods.