Jonathan Yaniv is a creepy Canadian transgender who likes to pose as a woman and call himself Jessica. He has not had any sort of surgery, has not lopped off his dick, yet thinks that just because he puts dresses on his paunchy body and make-up on his pit-bull features he can pass as a woman.
And legally everybody has to call him one. A mad law he decided to take full advantage of. How? By the simple expedient of going to a series of ladies’ beauty salons, and demanding that they carry out full waxing for hair removal all over his body. Even on the genitalia that the stupid queer law calls “her balls”. Well, it can’t be HER balls can it? Only men have testicles.
Naturally the female employees refused to do this. They are only trained to wax women and don’t feel comfortable handling the genitals of…
View original post 1,190 more words
aquarianmist 
Trans isn’t a fetish: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
“A mad law he decided to take full advantage of. How? By the simple expedient of going to a series of ladies’ beauty salons, and demanding that they carry out full waxing for hair removal all over his body. Even on the genitalia that the stupid queer law calls “her balls”. Well, it can’t be HER balls can it? Only men have testicles.
Naturally the female employees refused to do this. They are only trained to wax women and don’t feel comfortable handling the genitals of a strange – a VERY strange – man. They are nice, normal people and a cosmetician is not a whore.”
What if the woman was intersex? You fail.
https://www.foxnews.com/health/girl-with-rare-condition-gets-ok-to-have-testicles-removed
As I have stated before, I re-blog this type of post from the ‘Yes Gays Are Bullies’ website so your comments should be directed to that site. My own opinion on cases like this is quite simple. If a person is not born with a vagina and the female internal organs for ovulation, pregnancy and for giving birth, that person is not female. At this point in time there is no technology or medical treatment that can completely transform a man into a woman so people with identity problems should seek help to learn to live in the body that God, mother nature and their parents gave them. To some people, my opinion may seem bigoted but it is not meant to be so. I really do feel empathy for these unfortunate people but is hormone treatment and surgery the way forward for this very contentious issue. If we spent as much money exploring the human brain (inner space) as we do on exploring outer space, we may be able to determine the root cause of gender dysphoria.
aquarianmist
“My own opinion on cases like this is quite simple. If a person is not born with a vagina and the female internal organs for ovulation, pregnancy and for giving birth, that person is not female. ”
Ask this woman about that. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCllerian_agenesis
You are too narrow minded.
“If we spent as much money exploring the human brain (inner space) as we do on exploring outer space, we may be able to determine the root cause of gender dysphoria.”
Yes you admit it is biological.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
https://theconversation.com/how-genes-and-evolution-shape-gender-and-transgender-identity-108911
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30247609
transascity.org/the-transgender-brain/
“At this point in time there is no technology or medical treatment that can completely transform a man into a woman so people with identity problems should seek help to learn to live in the body that God, mother nature and their parents gave them. To some people, my opinion may seem bigoted but it is not meant to be”
It is: https://web.archive.org/web/20150906114126/https://genderanalysis.net/2015/09/paul-mchugh-is-wrong-transitioning-is-effective-gender-analysis-10/
If I am ‘narrow minded’ then so is the Supreme Entity (God, Mother Nature or whatever it was that created our solar system) because ‘it’ decreed that mammals will have a male and a female to procreate and ensure the survival of the species. Therefore, the concept of ‘sexual orientations’ is flawed. I see homosexuality as a sexual ‘disorientation’ because the desire to perform simulated acts of copulation with a person of the same gender does not meet the primary function of copulation. I also feel that people who believe they were born in the wrong body are also sexually ‘disoriented’ and cannot completely ‘change gender’ and still function as a male or female was intended to do. I don’t see how you can interpret my views as an admission that these sexual ‘disorientations’ are biological in nature.
aquarianmist
“If I am ‘narrow minded’ then so is the Supreme Entity (God, Mother Nature or whatever it was that created our solar system) because ‘it’ decreed that mammals will have a male and a female to procreate and ensure the survival of the species. Therefore, the concept of ‘sexual orientations’ is flawed. I see homosexuality as a sexual ‘disorientation’ because the desire to perform simulated acts of copulation with a person of the same gender does not meet the primary function of copulation.”
There is more to life than reproduction: https://www.reddit.com/r/badscience/comments/der10h/sex_is_for_reproduction_only/
“I also feel that people who believe they were born in the wrong body are also sexually ‘disoriented’ and cannot completely ‘change gender’ and still function as a male or female was intended to do. I don’t see how you can interpret my views as an admission that these sexual ‘disorientations’ are biological in nature.”
Gender dysphoria has nothing to do with sexuality, nor are they changing genders but affirming them: https://www.reddit.com/r/GGdiscussion/comments/ete11k/billy_d_aka_oneangrygamer_has_returned_and_is_as/