“Be yourself: Coming out as a homophobe.” Fighting back in an oppressive anti-family nation.

Yes, Gays Are Bullies

How soon will we in America have to put up with this kind of nonsense. At the rate things are going, I suspect it won’t be much longer.<ADMIN>

So-called ‘homophobia’ is illegal in the UK and can result in arrest.

VIDEO: Here’s how our MassResistance-UK chapter deals with it!

November 21, 2017

VIDEO: The British are fighting back! (6 min 49 sec)

Many of us here in the United States think that the oppressive and often fascist nature of the radical LGBT agenda is worse than anywhere. We see our children in public schools forcibly immersed in it with the threat of punishment or other retribution. People can easily lose their jobs or have their careers ruined if they don’t join in celebrating it. Business owners can lose their businesses if they don’t actively participate in it.

Sadly, it seems most conservatives here have reacted by cowering in fear of…

View original post 159 more words

Posted in Political | Leave a comment

Pride? WHO are they kidding?

Posted in Political | Leave a comment

Homosexual Adoption – A Failed Experiment. Matthew and Craig Scully-Hicks.

Yes, Gays Are Bullies

“Father” accused of murdering baby daughter a fortnight after adopting her

 Matthew Scully-Hicks is accused of killing his adopted daughter CREDIT: WALES NEWS SERVICE

fitness instructor who gave up his job to look after his adopted daughter, murdered her while his “husband” was at work, a court has heard.

Medical tests found that Elsie suffered bleeding on both sides of the brain, had several broken ribs, a fractured left femur and a fractured skull.

Matthew Scully-Hicks, 31, killed 18-month-old…

View original post 694 more words

Posted in Political | Leave a comment

Heartless Queer Couple Steal Cancer Sufferer’s Savings

Yes, Gays Are Bullies

Oh those lovable “gay” people, aren’t they just so delightful – in their own opinion? Always primping and posing expecting admiration when the fact is they’re really thoroughly selfish and disgusting. Wait for them to find a way of blaming this on homophobia!

Homosexual couple stole 80-year-old cancer sufferer’s £6,000 life savings

A HEARTLESS gay couple stole a terminally ill pensioner’s life savings and blew it on weekends away, luxury spas and buying a pair of French bulldogs.

Aaron Ryan and Nathan RobertsFAC

Aaron Ryan and Nathan Roberts stole £6,100 of a pensioner’s life savings

Aaron Ryan took advantage of frail Doreen Kelday, 80, after being employed to help care for the horses at her remote family farm.

Out of kindness, Mrs Kelday and daughter Paula Croft, 49, allowed Ryan, 32, to move into the annexe on…

View original post 421 more words

Posted in Political | Leave a comment

What are we being asked to decide

The cold war between supporters and opponents of homosexual marriage in Australia is heating up and becoming more aggressive. When we remove the slogans used by homosexual marriage supporters and ignore the shaming words they use against their opponents what we are being asked to decide is quite clear. The Australian people are being asked to decide if homosexual sex acts are a human right and should be protected by society and the state.

What we should be asking is this: is homosexuality it a sexual condition that afflicts a very small minority of the human race and if so, what do we need to do about it. I believe that society would be better served if in depth scientific research were to be conducted to try and solve this enigmatic sexual condition. Given that trillions of dollars are being spent on the scientific exploration of outer space, surely money can be spent exploring the most important and complex inner space on the planet – the human brain.


Posted in Political | Leave a comment

The Confused Politics of Homosexual Marriage

For a number of years supporters of homosexual marriage in Australia have been stating that opinion polls show most Australians are in favour of legalizing these marriages. Yet, at the same time, they have used every means at their disposal to prevent the Australian people from voting on this issue.  This is confusing.

At the last election, the Australian Federal Government promised to hold a plebiscite on this issue. However, supporters of homosexual marriage blocked the proposed plebiscite in the parliament. So to keep its promise, the government has had to resort to a postal survey instead. Homosexual supporters also tried to block this survey but failed. This is also confusing.

The Australian Federal Government has now initiated the postal survey in an effort to resolve this very controversial issue. The Australian people have been asked to answer one question which is “should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?” with a simple yes or no answer. However, because the postal survey is not compulsory what the outcome will be is unknown. But, nevertheless, homosexual marriage supporters are trying to convince people that the result will be a foregone conclusion in their favour. This is as perplexing as it is confusing.

In the lead up to the postal survey, the Federal Government have introduced temporary legislation to prevent people on either side of this issue from being intimidated, threatened or vilified. But, so far, it has been the supporters of homosexual marriage that have been doing this. Also, history tells us, that temporary legislation introduced by governments has a habit of becoming permanent.

Should the yes vote get over the line, a private member’s bill will be put before the Australian Parliament to amend the Marriage Act to include homosexual couples. I have no doubt that such a bill will be successful. But if the result is a no vote what then? Will supporters of homosexual marriage shut up and go home with their tails between their legs. Or will there be demonstrations and riots in the streets of our cities because they refuse to accept the will of the people. Unfortunately, I believe that the latter will be the case.

One of the arguments put forward by homosexual marriage supporters is that heterosexual marriage is “traditional.” However, I believe that neither church nor state invented or created marriage. Human beings are born with the natural instinct to form a long term bond with a member of the opposite sex to produce and rear children together. Children born into these unions are nurtured by both parents to adulthood and form a bond with them. This is natural not traditional.

I believe marriage laws simply reflect and protect this natural pair bonding of human males and females who wish to create their own biological family units. I also believe that the only traditional thing about marriage is the wedding ceremony be it religious or civil (state). For most people, this is the only input the church and state have in their marriages.

Supporters of homosexual marriage claim that legalization of homosexual marriage will not sent western civilization down a slippery slope to self destruction. I have to agree with this because I feel that western civilization began its descent down a slippery slope during the first half of the 20th century.

The major armed conflicts of the 20th century destroyed biological family units on a massive scale. Wives and mothers became widows and children were deprived of one or both biological parents. To fill the shortage of men caused by war, women entered the workforce en masse. Employers rewarded these hardworking women by paying them less than they would a man for doing the same job.

Single parenting became widespread and today is actively encouraged. We now have families where siblings have the same mother but different biological fathers. Some of these children will never know who their biological father is or his family history.

The end of World War Two in 1945 saw the start of the cold war between east and west. People had to cope with the genuine fear that, at any moment, they could be vaporized by a nuclear bomb.

Anti-establishment and anti-social groups began to appear and grow. This was also the dawn of the sexually promiscuous society with its unwanted pregnancies and back street abortions. These illegal abortions eventually created the lucrative ‘Planned Parenting’ abortion industry where children are sucked out of the womb and their organs harvested and sold.

The 1970’s saw the introduction of no fault divorce (walk in walk out marriage). Once again, children are deprived of the full time care of one (usually the father) of their biological parents.

The destruction of so many cooperative biological family units over the last hundred years has had a lasting negative effect on human social structure and society.  I was born in January 1941 and have lived through the social changes briefly outlined above. In my humble opinion, these social changes are the reason why we now live in a fragmented, volatile and drug fueled violent society.

Any further attacks on the natural biological family unit will not improve western civilization but take us further down the slippery slope to destruction.

As a final comment, I cannot shake the uneasy feeling that homosexuals are being used as unwitting dupes in a push to increase the separation of men from women and children from parents. This will further weaken the natural biological family unit and with it, change the cooperative nature of our society. If this is successful, the way will then be open to create a new world order. Where this will take western society is anybody’s guess.


Posted in Political | Leave a comment

The World’s Policeman

The  chemical weapons attack in Syria last Friday, was an attack on Syrians, by Syrians on Syrian soil and therefore, was a matter for the United Nations to address not the Americans. By preempting any UN action, Donald Trump has fell into the same trap as his predecessors by taking on the role of World policeman. As long as countries such as America continue to preempt UN actions, the UN will remain a very expensive toothless tiger.


Posted in Political | Leave a comment