aquarianmist

The responses I received about my last post (Politically Correct Sexism) from a person whose blog ID is snowylocks, questioned my honesty and integrity, so I decided to write this post in response rather than reply to snowylocks’ diatribe direct. snowylocks has accused me of ignoring facts, being dishonest, contradicting myself and being a Nazi sympathizer who condones the treatment meted out to homosexuals and lesbians by the Nazi regime.

I wish to make it quite clear to snowylocks and to anyone else who reads this post that I do not in any way condone the Hitler regime’s treatment of Jews, Gypsies, Poles, the intellectually and physically disabled, petty criminals, homosexuals, lesbians or any other unfortunates who were deemed to be enemies of the state or of no value to the German war machine. How snowylocks interpreted my last post as condoning these crimes against humanity is quite beyond me. snowylocks also stated that I would benefit from a WWII history lesson from a 12-year-old child. To demonstrate just how fanciful and ridiculous that statement is, it is with reluctance, I decided to share some of my personal history in this post.

My family, which consisted of my parents, two older brothers and me, lived in the seaport of Hull, which is located on the east coast of Yorkshire in England. Because Hull was a busy, thriving and important port at the outbreak of WWII, it became a prime target and the Luftwaffe bombed the shit out of the city over and over again. One morning, my family and I left the air raid shelter to walk home only to find a heap of rubble where our house once stood. At that point in time, all we had left in the world was the clothes we were wearing. But we were not alone; hundreds of other families lost everything during those air raids on Hull and other cities important to the Allied war effort.

My father was a merchant seaman and he lost lots of his friends and shipmates to the German U Boats. My Dad never got over his wartime experiences and died a manic-depressive at aged 55. It would have been nice if my brothers and I learned about WWII from the comfort and safety of a classroom as the 12-year-old child cited by snowylocks  obviously did but we didn’t, we lived through it. The wartime experiences of my brothers and I instilled in us a strong desire to serve our country. By the late 1950’s my eldest brother was serving with the Royal Navy, my second eldest brother was serving with the Royal Air force and I was serving with the British Army and we were proud of being able to do so.

During my Army posting to West Berlin in the early 1960’s, there were only three  Nazi war criminals left serving their sentences in Berlin’s Spandau prison. These were; Rudolf Hess, Hitler’s deputy; Albert Speer, Hitlers architect and Balder von Shirach, the Hitler youth leader. Guarding three men in an otherwise large empty prison was an eerie experience because the prison had a reputation for being haunted. This is not surprising given the atrocities that must have been committed behind its walls during the Nazi regime.

In my last post, I cited the Hitler youth movement simply to demonstrate how easy it is to indoctrinate (brainwash) children using political propaganda. For his crimes against children Balder von Shirach spent 20 years behind bars. It seems that this is where snowylocks got his or her knickers in a knot and interpreted my statement as condoning these sorts of crimes.

My understanding of the proposed sex education for primary schools in Australia is to educate children that heterosexuality is not the norm for human beings and that homosexual and lesbian sex are as normal and natural as heterosexual sex. In other words, according to homosexuals and lesbians, human beings are multi-sexual by nature and design. Put simply, this is an outrageous lie. Homosexual and lesbian sex has never been or ever will be normal and natural and children should not be exposed to such nonsensical ideas.

The proposed curriculum consists of nothing more than politically correct homosexual and lesbian propaganda to indoctrinate (brainwash) children into seeing human sexual behavior through the eyes and minds of a group of sexually dis-functional people. Is this any less of a crime than Balder von Shirach’s?

Snowylocks has already branded me as a dishonest, heterosexist, homophobic fascist so I wonder what he or she will come up with next. Ah well, on with the tin hat and flak jacket.

aquarianmist

Politically Correct Sexism.

Our politically correct masters have done it again. They have invented a new word for a new form of discrimination against homosexuals and lesbians.The word is HETEROSEXISM. It is now a politically incorrect to believe that heterosexuality is the norm for human sexual relationships because to do so means one is guilty of heterosexism which, in turn feeds homophobia. A pilot scheme has been introduced into New South Wales Australian high schools to stamp out heterosexism in schools and prevent the ignoring of and the making invisible of non heterosexuals and their interests. One also has to be very careful how one utters and uses the word ‘gay’ in order to avoid any possibility of using the word in a derogatory, heterosexist or homophobic manner.

A national curriculum is also being developed for children in grades 3 and 4. This curriculum will encourage children to develop appropriate ways to respond to sexual diversity in ways that demonstrate respect and value difference. In other words children, under the guise of sex education, will be indoctrinated to believe heterosexuality is not the norm for humans and that homosexuality and lesbianism are normal and natural forms of sexual activity. Isn’t this how NAZI Germany brainwashed their children into believing that they were the master race and the Jews sub-human and must be exterminated. Catch them young and control their minds.

Who do these people think they are? How has a small minority group of people with gender identity issues achieved so much power and authority over the vast majority of the western population to the extent that we can no longer protect our children from homosexual and lesbian propaganda. At the same time, heterosexuals are being legally gagged from saying anything that may upset these people. Is this democracy? I am beginning to think that unconditional decriminalization of unnatural sex acts was a big mistake.

Why not go the whole way and make homosexuality and lesbianism compulsory. Anyone engaging in heterosexual sex would then be arrested and sent to concentration camps for sexual re-orientation indoctrination. Think of the benefits for Planet Earth. The human population would decline, greenhouse gasses would decline, global warming would decline and the ice caps stop melting. The oceans will once again abound with marine life and  rain forests will cover the land. The naked ape will become extinct and the hairy ape will thrive in the rain forests. The evolutionary process can then begin all over again and let us hope that Mother Nature gets it right the second time around.

The message of this post is simple. Homosexuals and lesbians – LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE. Let them enjoy their all too brief age of innocence and allow them to make their own minds up when the time is right for them. not for you.

aquarianmist

Not only do the Australian Greens political party want to legalize homosexual and lesbian marriages, they now want to legalize polygamous marriages as well. It appears that the Greens, a minority political party, are using these issues to secure the votes of minority groups that live on the fringes of society. And, let us not forget, it was the Australian Labor party that lifted the blankets and invited the Greens into their bed in order to cling on to power. If not for this union, these issues may never have seen the light of day.

Polygamy has been around for as long as we have. Zoologist Desmond Morris, author of   ‘The Naked Ape’ is of the opinion that polygamy may have been used from time to time as a temporary measure when there was a surplus of breeding women due to the high morality rate of man the hunter. Rather than waste the breeding potential of these woman, polygamous relationships may have been used to ensure the survival and growth of the group. Such an arrangement would have required a group effort to feed and nurture the polygamous group because the work load for one hunter would have been impossible to manage.

There is however another possibility. We may have inherited the polygamous instinct  from our primate ancestors. Some groups of primates practice polygyny where a dominant male has exclusive relationships with two or more females. If modern man did inherit this instinct from primates, it may account for man’s propensity to compete in trials of strength, endurance and skill, to be the champion, the gold medalist, the dominant male. For modern man, polygamy will be nothing more than an ego trip.

In order to prevent discrimination, women will also be entitled to practice polyandry, that is, marry more than one husband. Again, to avoid discrimination, one homosexual will be entitled to marry more than one homosexual and the same will apply to lesbians. Personally I cannot think of anything more grotesquely burlesque than that. In order to avoid discriminating between different groups of consenting adults, why not legalize marriage between siblings in incestuous relationships? What about heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles? Do we keep on locking them up or do we simply abolish the age of consent to cater for their particular ‘sexual orientation.’

For hundreds of thousands of years, long-term monogamous relationships that we call love and marriage has been the keystone of human survival, growth, development and success. Weaken or remove that keystone will bring the building blocks of western society tumbling down. People will lose their sense of family, sense of belonging, sense purpose and sense of direction. The stage will then be set for the introduction of a new world order that, in my view, will be far more repressive than the religious, communist and fascist regimes of our history.

aquarianmist

I recently received a copy of my latest medical report and was pleased to note that, for my age, I am in reasonable health. But I was dumbfounded to see in my report that I have been assigned a ‘sexual orientation.’ Silly old me. As a human being, I have always believed that being heterosexual is normal and natural, not a ‘sexual orientation.’

I am beginning to wonder where our politically correct masters and their judicial lackeys are taking western society with all this sexual manipulation.

Human beings are a heterosexual species born with the natural instinct to bond, mate and copulate with a member of the opposite sex to produce young. Therefore, a man, woman and child are a normal and natural family, bonded by the heterosexual instincts they were born with. This long-term bonding is part of being human and is what separates us from the beasts of the field. We have been this way since we first stood up on our feet, left the rain forests and formed our earliest human settlements. This is our nature. And, this has nothing to do with religion, tradition or politics.

As far as I am aware, homosexuals are fully functional males and lesbians are fully functioning females, so there is no physical impediment preventing them from marrying a member of the opposite sex and having children the way nature intended. However, they choose to form an unnatural sexual relationship with a member of the same-sex. Simply put, they voluntarily relinquish all things heterosexual.

My view is a simplistic one. As stated in an earlier post on this issue, homosexuals and lesbians are suffering with a sexual dis-function centered in the brain to the extent that they don’t know whether they are male or female. In other words, without meaning to be unkind, they are natures genetic sexual misfits.

Given the advances being made in our knowledge of the brain through deep brain research and neurology, it is only a matter of time before the area of the brain that triggers sexual arousal will be located. These types of non-physical sexual dis-functions can then be treated and corrected. Surely this will be a better outcome for western society than embracing unnatural same-sex relationships. Let us hope that this happens sooner rather than later.

So what is really happening here? Why has a minority group of sexually dis-functional people become such a hot political issue? Should it not be a medical issue? Has any political party been given a mandate to enact same-sex marriage legislation? Are our politically correct masters supporting same-sex marriage to secure the votes of a minority group in the hope of retaining power? Are homosexual and lesbian politicians simply trying to get their partners onto the public purse gravy train? Why are the people being denied the democratic right to vote on this contentious issue? Questions, questions, questions.

In pursuing same-sex marriage, our politically correct masters are not giving any thought to the possible long-term effects on western society. In effect, same-sex marriage legislation will divide human beings into three separate sexual groups.

Human beings have always tended to gravitate to that which is familiar and where they feel safe. Therefore, three sexual groups will form separate enclaves within our cities. In time these enclaves will develop into separate sexual communities each with their own subcultures, councils, by laws and services. In other words, sexual apartheid will develop.  Demarcation lines and no-go areas will then appear across our cities.We already live in a volatile and violent society and sexual segregation will increase street violence and thrill killings to a point where authorities will not be able to maintain control.

The biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah may be just that, a story. But the biblical message from the past is crystal clear. If we continue with the madness that is same-sex marriage, we will be sowing the seeds of our own destruction. Because some western jurisdictions have already embraced same-sex marriage, the storm clouds are already gathering on the horizon. This will eventually cause a societal upheaval not experienced since World War 2 in Europe. What then?

I am not an extremist. I do not suffer with the mythical mental illness of homophobia. I am a heterosexual male born into a heterosexual species and wish to see it stay that way.

aquarianmist